3 ms·
> Most of that is false What is false specifically? The fact that an immigration judge determined Garcia was deportable does not contradict the fact that the s
by jhp123 1y ago
> Most of that is false
What is false specifically? The fact that an immigration judge determined Garcia was deportable does not contradict the fact that the same order was withheld later on, much as you try to imply it.
>> the Trump administration admitted they made a mistake in deporting him.
> Incorrect.
Actually you are incorrect, quoting from [0]: "the Government conceded during the district court hearing, “The facts -- we concede the facts. This person should -- the plaintiff, Abrego Garcia, should not have been removed. That is not in dispute.”"
[0] https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25881148/ca4-ag.pdf https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25881148/ca4-ag.pdf
- rayiner 1y ago“Withheld” has a specific meaning in this context. As explained in the subsequent order (appendix page 11a of the material I linked above: “Withholding of removal, in contrast to asylum, confers only the right not to be deported to a particular country rather than the right to remain in the U.S.” Garcia was deportable. He was only not deportable to El Salvador.
- jhp123 1y agoFirst of all, thank you for conceding my second point, that you were mistaken when you said "Incorrect." > “Withheld” has a specific meaning in this context okay, but the person you replied to didn't say "Garcia could not be deported to Switzerland, because the judge withheld the order." He just said the judge withheld the order, which is correct. And then you responded and said it was wrong. Actually, no one is talking about the legal basis for deporting Garcia to Switzerland or Djibouti, except you, because he wasn't deported to Switzerland or Djibouti but to El Salvador.