> the fact of the matter is every system is hackable to an extent. True, but the extents can differ quite a lot. A system that requires someone to physically m

> the fact of the matter is every system is hackable to an extent. True, but the extents can differ quite a lot. A system that requires someone to physically mount media has an inherent security benefit just from not being available until someone physically mounts the media. > not these pesky hackable digital records every other business on the planet uses. Not every other business on the planet uses always online digital records, and those that do don't exactly have a stellar security history. I'm not arguing here that one is better than the other in this particular case. Making that determination requires balancing a lot of factors that I have no data about. But removable physical media does have some advantages here.