66 ms·

The current international situation as understood by a lot of people in republican circles is outline in detail here: https://youtu.be/vDBZeHhx3YE https://yout

The current international situation as understood by a lot of people in republican circles is outline in detail here: https://youtu.be/vDBZeHhx3YE https://youtu.be/vDBZeHhx3YE > The US reliably enforces international order and global trade now Yes, which is why many believe now is the time to revamp our industrial capacity while we still have strategic dominance. The war in Ukraine has illustrated the importance of mass drone production, and we currently lack a lot of the direct capacity to make them. A lot of our military supply chains are also based too heavily on components assembled and manufactured in China and in parts of east Asia that could easily be disrupted and cripple our ability to project power and play the role we currently play.

alabastervlog 1y ago
You can improve all those things, even fast, without doing… this. Tariffing close allies at the same time as likely or actual foes especially doesn’t make sense. And rather than this weird roundabout approach, the government can just… pay for things to happen. Like, they used to run weapons factories. If that’s the actual reason for this, it would have been a ton cheaper to just fire up a few government factories, continue and expand the chips act, and maybe ramp up some targeted tariffs and other controls, which would have been way more effective with allies on board. Or, they can start placing drone orders and handing out r&d contracts with specifications that they be entirely made in the USA. You may be presenting a real perspective, and it could be entirely correct, and this still would be extremely stupid.
- didericis 1y ago
  Yes, this is a real perspective. Again, I’m not endorsing the approach they’re taking, I’m simply explaining it. I also don’t think even a moderate introduction of tariffs would have been viewed favorably. Reindustrialization is I think necessary/I agree with the desire to ramp up domestic production and secure supply chains in both America and Europe, but we haven’t done it yet because it’s going to be painful to reverse the current trajectory. This could very well be a part of a kind of shock deal to get allies to know we’re serious as we negotiate down. I’m not saying I agree with that tactic, either, and the complaints about the damage in trust are extremely valid.

alabastervlog 1y ago

You can improve all those things, even fast, without doing… this. Tariffing close allies at the same time as likely or actual foes especially doesn’t make sense. And rather than this weird roundabout approach, the government can just… pay for things to happen. Like, they used to run weapons factories. If that’s the actual reason for this, it would have been a ton cheaper to just fire up a few government factories, continue and expand the chips act, and maybe ramp up some targeted tariffs and other controls, which would have been way more effective with allies on board. Or, they can start placing drone orders and handing out r&d contracts with specifications that they be entirely made in the USA. You may be presenting a real perspective, and it could be entirely correct, and this still would be extremely stupid.

didericis 1y ago
Yes, this is a real perspective. Again, I’m not endorsing the approach they’re taking, I’m simply explaining it. I also don’t think even a moderate introduction of tariffs would have been viewed favorably. Reindustrialization is I think necessary/I agree with the desire to ramp up domestic production and secure supply chains in both America and Europe, but we haven’t done it yet because it’s going to be painful to reverse the current trajectory. This could very well be a part of a kind of shock deal to get allies to know we’re serious as we negotiate down. I’m not saying I agree with that tactic, either, and the complaints about the damage in trust are extremely valid.