To write an unbiased systematic review, there are procedures. In context to the scientific method, isn't RAG also wrong? Generate a bad argument and then sour

To write an unbiased systematic review, there are procedures. In context to the scientific method, isn't RAG also wrong? Generate a bad argument and then source support for it with RAG or by only searching for confirmation biased support. I suppose I make this mistake too; I don't prepare systematic reviews, so my research meta-procedure has always been inadequate. Usually I just [...] but a more scientific procedure would be [...].