4 ms·
Current copyright yes. But do you not for a second think that the current way the laws and rules are set are because of how hard and time consuming it was to r
by SirMaster 2y ago
Current copyright yes.
But do you not for a second think that the current way the laws and rules are set are because of how hard and time consuming it was to replicate work?
Just because "that's how it's always been" doesn't mean it's acceptable to keep it that way when the means to perform the action have so drastically changed.
- fc417fc802 2y agoI don't think the rules ever existed for the benefit of the individual, but rather the collective. If skilled artists couldn't sustain themselves from their work they wouldn't exist. Historically there was no alternative. When a machine can do something there is not generally a (collectively beneficial) reason to protect the individual that competes with it. Backhoes weren't regulated in order to protect ditch diggers.