9 ms·

It would be an understatement to call this a skewed perspective. In most of the anecdotes they seem to try really hard to trivialize the productive benefits of

It would be an understatement to call this a skewed perspective. In most of the anecdotes they seem to try really hard to trivialize the productive benefits of AI, which is difficult to take seriously. The case that LLMs create flawed outputs or are limited in what they can do is not controversial at all, but by and large, reports by experienced developers is that it has improved their productivity, and it's now part of their workflow. Whether businesses and hire-ups try to use it in absurd ways is neither here nor there. That, and culture issues, were a problem before AI. Obviously some workers have a strong incentive to oppose adoption, because it may jeopardize their careers. Even if the capabilities are over-stated it can be a self-fulfilling prophecy as higher-ups choices may go. Union shops will try to stall it, but it's here to stay. You're in a globally competitive market.

oneeyedpigeon 2y ago
I have very little objection to AI, providing we get UBI to mitigate the fallout.
- lanfeust6 2y ago
  Right, well even without AGI (no two people agree on whether it's coming within 5 years, 30, or 100), finely-tuned LLMs can disrupt the economy fast if the bottlenecks get taken care of. The big one is the robot-economy. This is popularly placed further off in timescales, but it does not require AGI at all. We already have humanoid robots on the market for the price of a small car, they're just dumb. Once we scale up solar and battery production, and then manufacturing, it's coming for menial labor jobs. They already have all the pieces, it's a foregone conclusion. What we don't know how to do is to create a real "intelligence", and here the evangelists will wax about the algorithms and the nature of intelligence, but at the end of the day it takes more than scaling up an LLM to constitute an AGI. The bet is that AI-assisted research will lead to breakthrough in a trivial amount of time. With white-collar jobs the threat of AI feels more abstract and localized, and you still get talk about "creating new jobs", but when robots start coming off the assembly line people will demand UBI so fast it will make your head spin. Either that or they'll try to set fire to them or block them with unions, etc. Hard to say when because another effort like the CHIPS act could expedite things.
  - dingnuts 2y ago
    Humanoid robots on the market for the price of a small car? That's complete science fiction. There have been demos of such robots but only demos.
    - lanfeust6 2y ago
      > Humanoid robots on the market for the price of a small car? That's complete science fiction. Goldman Sachs doesn't think so. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/humanoid-robots-market-110188 https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/humanoid-robots-mark... https://finance.yahoo.com/news/humanoid-robot-market-research-global-143600290.html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/humanoid-robot-market-researc... https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/robotics-market https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/robotics... They don't even need to be humanoid is the thing.
      - stuckinhell 2y ago
        16k humanoid robots https://www.unitree.com/g1/ https://www.unitree.com/g1/
        Izkata 2y ago
        And 1X has apparently been testing theirs in home environments for months, though it looks like they're not for sale yet: https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/21/norways-1x-is-building-a-humanoid-robot-for-the-home/ https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/21/norways-1x-is-building-a-h...
  - stuckinhell 2y ago
    https://www.unitree.com/g1/ https://www.unitree.com/g1/ 16k humanoid robot
    - namaria 2y ago
      Do they do anything or are they an expensive toy in the shape of a humanoid robot?
- parpfish 2y ago
  I was thinking about this and realized that if we want an AI boom to lead to UBI, AI needs to start replacing the cushy white collar jobs first. If you start by replacing menial labor, there will be more unemployment but you’re not going to build the political will to do anything because those jobs were seen as “less than” and the political class will talk about how good and efficient it is that these jobs are gone. You need to start by automating away “good jobs” that directly affect middle/upper class people. Jobs where people have extensive training and/or a “calling” to the field. Once lawyers, software engineers, doctors, executives, etc get smacked with widespread unemployment, the political class will take UBI much more seriously.
  - lanfeust6 2y ago
    Incidentally it seems to be happening in that order, but laborers won't have a long respite (if you can call it that)
    - parpfish 2y ago
      i think that the factor determining which jobs get usurped by AI first isn't going to be based on the cognitive difficulty as much as it is about robotic difficulty and interaction with the physical world. if you job consists of reading from a computer -> thinking -> entering things back into a computer, you're on the top of the list because you don't need to set up a bunch of new sensors and actuators. In other words… the easier it is to do your job remotely, the more likely it is you’ll get automated away
  - waveringana 2y ago
    needing a lawyer and needing a doctor are very common cases of bankruptcy in the US. both feel very primed to be replaced by models
  - stuckinhell 2y ago
    I suspect elites will build a two-tiered AI system where only a select few get access to the cutting-edge stuff, while the rest of us get stuck with the leftovers. They'll use their clout—money, lobbying, and media influence—to lock in their advantage and keep decision-making within their circle. In the end, this setup would just widen the gap, cementing power imbalances as AI continues to reshape everything. UBI will become the bare minimum to keep the masses sedated.
- hello_computer 2y ago
  But why will that happen? If they have robots and AI and all the money, what’s stopping the powers that be from disposing of the excess biomass?
  - lanfeust6 2y ago
    What's there to gain? What do they care about biomass? They're still in the business of selling products, until the economy explodes. I find this to be circular because you could say the same thing about right now, "why don't they dispose of the welfare class" etc. There's also the fact that "they" aren't all one and the same persons with the exact same worldview and interests.
    - hello_computer 2y ago
      The Davos class was highly concerned about ecology before Davos was even a thing. In America, their minions (the “coastie” class) are coming to see the liquidation of the kulaks as perhaps not such a bad thing. If it devolves into a “let them eat cake” scenario, one has to wonder how things will play out in “proles vs robot pinkertons”. Watch what the sonic crowd control trucks did in Serbia last week. Of course there is always the issue of “demand”—of keeping the factories humming, but when you are worth billions, your immediate subordinates are worth hundreds of millions, and all of their subordinates are worth a few million, maybe you come to a point where “lebensraum” becomes more valuable to you than another zero at the end of your balance? When AI replaces the nerds (in progress), they become excess biomass. Not talking about a retarded hollywood-style apocalypse. Economic uncertainty is more than enough to suppress breeding in many populations. “not with a bang, but a whimper” If you know any of “them”, you will know that “they” went to the same elite prep schools, live in the same cities, intermarry, etc. The “equality” nonsense is just a lie to numb the proles. In 2025 we have a full-blown hereditary nobility. edit: answer to ianfeust6: The West is not The World. There are over a billion Chinese, Indians, Africans… Words mean things. Who said tree hugger? If you are an apex predator living in an increasingly cloudy tank, there is an obvious solution to the cloudyness.
      - 2y ago
hello_computer 2y ago
It’s karma. The creatives weren’t terribly concerned when the factory guys lost their jobs. “Lern to code!” Now it’s our turn to “Learn to OnlyFans” or “Learn to Homeless”
- Fraterkes 2y ago
  "learn to code" was thrown around by programmers, not creatives. Everyone else (including writers and artists) has long hated that phrase, and condemded it as stupid and shortsighted.
  - hello_computer 2y ago
    “learn to code” was from the media. whether they deserve to be classified as “creatives” i will leave to the philosophers.
- Terr_ 2y ago
  > The creatives [...] “Lern to code!” No, the underlying format of "$LABOR_ISSUE can be solved by $CHANGE_JOB" comes from a place of politics, where a politician is trying to suggest they have a plan to somehow tackle a painful problem among their constituents, and that therefore they should be (re-)elected. Then the politicians piled onto "coal-miners can learn to code" etc. because it was uniquely attractive, since: 1. No big capital expenditures, so they don't need to promise/explain how a new factory will get built. 2. The potential for remote work means constituents wouldn't need to sell their homes or move. 3. Participants wouldn't require multiple years of expensive formal schooling. 4. It had some "more money than you make now" appeal.
  - hello_computer 2y ago
    Stating it in patronizing fact-checker tone does not make it true. The tech nerds started it (they love cheap labor pools). Then the politicians joined their masters’ bandwagon. It was a PR blitz. Who has the money for those? Dorseys, Grahams, & Zuckerbergs, or petty-millionaire mayors & congressmen? Politicians are just the house slaves—servants of money. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learn_to_Code#Codecademy_and_Code.org https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learn_to_Code#Codecademy_and_C...
Fraterkes 2y ago
If ai exacerbates culture issues and management incompetence then that is an inherent downside of ai. There is a bunch of programmers who like ai, but as the article shows, programmers are not the only people subjected to ai in the workplace. If you're an artist, you've taken a job that has crap pay and stability for the amount of training you put in, and the only reason you do it is because you like the actual content of the job (physically making art). There is obviously no upside to ai for those people, and this focus on the managers' or developers' perspective is myopic.
- lanfeust6 2y ago
  It's an interesting point that passion-jobs that creatives take on (including game dev) tend to get paid less, and where the thrilling component is disrupted there could be less incentive to bother entering the field. I think for the most part creatives will still line up for these gigs, because they care about contributing to the end products, not the amount of time they spend using Blender.
  - Fraterkes 2y ago
    You are again just thinking from the perspective of a manager: Yes, if these ai jobs need to be filled, artists will be the people filling them. But from the artists perspective there are fewer jobs, and the jobs that do remain are less fulfilling. So: from the perspective of a large part of the workforce it is completely true and rational to say that ai at their job has mostly downsides.
    - lanfeust6 2y ago
      > from the artists perspective there are fewer jobs, and the jobs that do remain are less fulfilling. Re-read what I wrote. You repeated what I said. > So: from the perspective of a large part of the workforce it is completely true and rational to say that ai at their job has mostly downsides. For them, maybe.
      - Fraterkes 2y ago

oneeyedpigeon 2y ago

I have very little objection to AI, providing we get UBI to mitigate the fallout.

lanfeust6 2y ago
Right, well even without AGI (no two people agree on whether it's coming within 5 years, 30, or 100), finely-tuned LLMs can disrupt the economy fast if the bottlenecks get taken care of. The big one is the robot-economy. This is popularly placed further off in timescales, but it does not require AGI at all. We already have humanoid robots on the market for the price of a small car, they're just dumb. Once we scale up solar and battery production, and then manufacturing, it's coming for menial labor jobs. They already have all the pieces, it's a foregone conclusion. What we don't know how to do is to create a real "intelligence", and here the evangelists will wax about the algorithms and the nature of intelligence, but at the end of the day it takes more than scaling up an LLM to constitute an AGI. The bet is that AI-assisted research will lead to breakthrough in a trivial amount of time. With white-collar jobs the threat of AI feels more abstract and localized, and you still get talk about "creating new jobs", but when robots start coming off the assembly line people will demand UBI so fast it will make your head spin. Either that or they'll try to set fire to them or block them with unions, etc. Hard to say when because another effort like the CHIPS act could expedite things.
- dingnuts 2y ago
  Humanoid robots on the market for the price of a small car? That's complete science fiction. There have been demos of such robots but only demos.
  - lanfeust6 2y ago
    > Humanoid robots on the market for the price of a small car? That's complete science fiction. Goldman Sachs doesn't think so. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/humanoid-robots-market-110188 https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/humanoid-robots-mark... https://finance.yahoo.com/news/humanoid-robot-market-research-global-143600290.html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/humanoid-robot-market-researc... https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/robotics-market https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/robotics... They don't even need to be humanoid is the thing.
    - stuckinhell 2y ago
      16k humanoid robots https://www.unitree.com/g1/ https://www.unitree.com/g1/
      - Izkata 2y ago
        And 1X has apparently been testing theirs in home environments for months, though it looks like they're not for sale yet: https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/21/norways-1x-is-building-a-humanoid-robot-for-the-home/ https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/21/norways-1x-is-building-a-h...
- stuckinhell 2y ago
  https://www.unitree.com/g1/ https://www.unitree.com/g1/ 16k humanoid robot
  - namaria 2y ago
    Do they do anything or are they an expensive toy in the shape of a humanoid robot?
parpfish 2y ago
I was thinking about this and realized that if we want an AI boom to lead to UBI, AI needs to start replacing the cushy white collar jobs first. If you start by replacing menial labor, there will be more unemployment but you’re not going to build the political will to do anything because those jobs were seen as “less than” and the political class will talk about how good and efficient it is that these jobs are gone. You need to start by automating away “good jobs” that directly affect middle/upper class people. Jobs where people have extensive training and/or a “calling” to the field. Once lawyers, software engineers, doctors, executives, etc get smacked with widespread unemployment, the political class will take UBI much more seriously.
- lanfeust6 2y ago
  Incidentally it seems to be happening in that order, but laborers won't have a long respite (if you can call it that)
  - parpfish 2y ago
    i think that the factor determining which jobs get usurped by AI first isn't going to be based on the cognitive difficulty as much as it is about robotic difficulty and interaction with the physical world. if you job consists of reading from a computer -> thinking -> entering things back into a computer, you're on the top of the list because you don't need to set up a bunch of new sensors and actuators. In other words… the easier it is to do your job remotely, the more likely it is you’ll get automated away
- waveringana 2y ago
  needing a lawyer and needing a doctor are very common cases of bankruptcy in the US. both feel very primed to be replaced by models
- stuckinhell 2y ago
  I suspect elites will build a two-tiered AI system where only a select few get access to the cutting-edge stuff, while the rest of us get stuck with the leftovers. They'll use their clout—money, lobbying, and media influence—to lock in their advantage and keep decision-making within their circle. In the end, this setup would just widen the gap, cementing power imbalances as AI continues to reshape everything. UBI will become the bare minimum to keep the masses sedated.
hello_computer 2y ago
But why will that happen? If they have robots and AI and all the money, what’s stopping the powers that be from disposing of the excess biomass?
- lanfeust6 2y ago
  What's there to gain? What do they care about biomass? They're still in the business of selling products, until the economy explodes. I find this to be circular because you could say the same thing about right now, "why don't they dispose of the welfare class" etc. There's also the fact that "they" aren't all one and the same persons with the exact same worldview and interests.
  - hello_computer 2y ago
    The Davos class was highly concerned about ecology before Davos was even a thing. In America, their minions (the “coastie” class) are coming to see the liquidation of the kulaks as perhaps not such a bad thing. If it devolves into a “let them eat cake” scenario, one has to wonder how things will play out in “proles vs robot pinkertons”. Watch what the sonic crowd control trucks did in Serbia last week. Of course there is always the issue of “demand”—of keeping the factories humming, but when you are worth billions, your immediate subordinates are worth hundreds of millions, and all of their subordinates are worth a few million, maybe you come to a point where “lebensraum” becomes more valuable to you than another zero at the end of your balance? When AI replaces the nerds (in progress), they become excess biomass. Not talking about a retarded hollywood-style apocalypse. Economic uncertainty is more than enough to suppress breeding in many populations. “not with a bang, but a whimper” If you know any of “them”, you will know that “they” went to the same elite prep schools, live in the same cities, intermarry, etc. The “equality” nonsense is just a lie to numb the proles. In 2025 we have a full-blown hereditary nobility. edit: answer to ianfeust6: The West is not The World. There are over a billion Chinese, Indians, Africans… Words mean things. Who said tree hugger? If you are an apex predator living in an increasingly cloudy tank, there is an obvious solution to the cloudyness.
    - 2y ago

hello_computer 2y ago

It’s karma. The creatives weren’t terribly concerned when the factory guys lost their jobs. “Lern to code!” Now it’s our turn to “Learn to OnlyFans” or “Learn to Homeless”

Fraterkes 2y ago
"learn to code" was thrown around by programmers, not creatives. Everyone else (including writers and artists) has long hated that phrase, and condemded it as stupid and shortsighted.
- hello_computer 2y ago
  “learn to code” was from the media. whether they deserve to be classified as “creatives” i will leave to the philosophers.
Terr_ 2y ago
> The creatives [...] “Lern to code!” No, the underlying format of "$LABOR_ISSUE can be solved by $CHANGE_JOB" comes from a place of politics, where a politician is trying to suggest they have a plan to somehow tackle a painful problem among their constituents, and that therefore they should be (re-)elected. Then the politicians piled onto "coal-miners can learn to code" etc. because it was uniquely attractive, since: 1. No big capital expenditures, so they don't need to promise/explain how a new factory will get built. 2. The potential for remote work means constituents wouldn't need to sell their homes or move. 3. Participants wouldn't require multiple years of expensive formal schooling. 4. It had some "more money than you make now" appeal.
- hello_computer 2y ago
  Stating it in patronizing fact-checker tone does not make it true. The tech nerds started it (they love cheap labor pools). Then the politicians joined their masters’ bandwagon. It was a PR blitz. Who has the money for those? Dorseys, Grahams, & Zuckerbergs, or petty-millionaire mayors & congressmen? Politicians are just the house slaves—servants of money. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learn_to_Code#Codecademy_and_Code.org https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learn_to_Code#Codecademy_and_C...

Fraterkes 2y ago

If ai exacerbates culture issues and management incompetence then that is an inherent downside of ai. There is a bunch of programmers who like ai, but as the article shows, programmers are not the only people subjected to ai in the workplace. If you're an artist, you've taken a job that has crap pay and stability for the amount of training you put in, and the only reason you do it is because you like the actual content of the job (physically making art). There is obviously no upside to ai for those people, and this focus on the managers' or developers' perspective is myopic.

lanfeust6 2y ago
It's an interesting point that passion-jobs that creatives take on (including game dev) tend to get paid less, and where the thrilling component is disrupted there could be less incentive to bother entering the field. I think for the most part creatives will still line up for these gigs, because they care about contributing to the end products, not the amount of time they spend using Blender.
- Fraterkes 2y ago
  You are again just thinking from the perspective of a manager: Yes, if these ai jobs need to be filled, artists will be the people filling them. But from the artists perspective there are fewer jobs, and the jobs that do remain are less fulfilling. So: from the perspective of a large part of the workforce it is completely true and rational to say that ai at their job has mostly downsides.
  - lanfeust6 2y ago
    > from the artists perspective there are fewer jobs, and the jobs that do remain are less fulfilling. Re-read what I wrote. You repeated what I said. > So: from the perspective of a large part of the workforce it is completely true and rational to say that ai at their job has mostly downsides. For them, maybe.
    - Fraterkes 2y ago