3 ms·
Yeah, I'm not sure this is following the HN guidelines, judging by the parts about IP Rights... > Except as expressly authorized by Y Combinator, you agree not
by voidUpdate 1y ago
Yeah, I'm not sure this is following the HN guidelines, judging by the parts about IP Rights...
> Except as expressly authorized by Y Combinator, you agree not to modify, copy, frame, scrape, [...] or create derivative works based on the Site or the Site Content, in whole or in part, [...]. In connection with your use of the Site you will not engage in or use any data mining, robots, scraping or similar data gathering or extraction methods
Though I guess this is a tool to produce such content, rather than the author doing this themselves, its ok?
- cratermoon 1y agoThe generative AI industry long ago demonstrated that it doesn't think things like "copyright", "Terms of Service" or "laws" apply.
- TeMPOraL 1y ago"Terms of Service" are a contractual manner, and in most situations are just treated as suggestions. Whether or not the companies stand in violation of copyright is still being determined. I fail to see what laws they otherwise think don't apply. On the contrary, it seems there's a lot of people on the Internet who think copyright means something different than it actually does, and therefore justifies them their Dog in the Manger attitude.
- jeffhuys 1y agoI'm not really sure actually. But to be honest, I'd rather see these tools be public instead of private; you can't really block this kind of thing anyway. Better have it out in the open where others can benefit/learn... This whole thing is a Pandora's box. We can regulate, forbid, anything, but we all already have models downloaded locally (you did too, right..?). So unless there's some client-side "computer says no" we will never be able to block this anymore.
- voidUpdate 1y agoNo, I don't have any models downloaded locally. I've tried a couple of models in the past and found they aren't that useful for me
- simonw 1y agoHow long ago? The local models were mostly unusably weak until about six months ago when they suddenly got useful: Qwen Coder 2.5, Llama 3.3 70B, Mistral Small 3 and Gemma 3 have all really impressed me on a 64GB Mac and I expect Mistral Small 3 would work in 32GB. Meanwhile this years's Gemini Pro 2.5, Claude 3.7 Sonnet and the most recent GPT-4o API models (or o3-mini high for coding) are significantly better than what we were using last year.
- voidUpdate 1y agoI don't know, 5-6 months ago? I used them, found them acceptable at making human sounding text, and haven't really used them since. I've not found a use-case for them that is useful to me. If I don't know how to program something, I'll google it, or just work it out myself
- simonw 1y agoI wrote about my own processes using LLMs for code here (mainly aimed at people who aren't finding LLMs useful for coding yet): https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/11/using-llms-for-code/ https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/11/using-llms-for-code/
- voidUpdate 1y agoIt feels like a lot of the advice I'm seeing is aimed at people who just want to have something that works. I program because I like programming, not because I want a finished thing now. The stuff I program at work is well within my abilities, and uses libraries I'm pretty familiar with, so I don't need a program to write it for me, and when I'm doing stuff in my free time, its because I want to program, so I don't want it to be done for me. The best use I've found for LLMs is generating place names in DnD