3 ms·
That's a needlessly uncharitable interpretation, but it is an interesting point. I think that increased rates of low (and high) grade neurodivergence in men, a
by seabird 2y ago
That's a needlessly uncharitable interpretation, but it is an interesting point.
I think that increased rates of low (and high) grade neurodivergence in men, and society expecting eccentric behavior from men, especially as they age, results in in the sort of characters that make something like this work. Umarells in Italy come to mind.
- Cthulhu_ 1y agoThere's quite a few assumptions in your comment; one, that men have higher grades of neurodivergece than women (whereas it can also be underdiagnosis or masking through higher societal expectations on women). Women are eccentric too.
- ConspiracyFact 1y agoMen are more dissimilar from one another, generally, than women are from one another. Sorry.
- laurent_du 1y agoThis is a well-known fact with a well-established genetic basis. For pretty much any trait, the standard deviation of the distribution for men is larger than the distribution for women.
- sceptic123 1y agoBold claim with no sources there
- nothrabannosir 1y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis I guess you live up to your username, though not the most flattering interpretation of it :D :D
- GuinansEyebrows 1y agoIf there are studies that prove this, can i see them? And are there equivalent studies on populations of women? Or is this a Kodak situation where there’s just at best an assumption based on existing biases?