3 ms·
That appears to be an issue of policy not one of technology. Because they'd more than likely target those same individuals with less precise weapons if not for
by sightbroke 2y ago
That appears to be an issue of policy not one of technology.
Because they'd more than likely target those same individuals with less precise weapons if not for the given alternative.
- blix 2y agoThe technology enables the policy. If the cost and risk were higher, there would be fewer strikes.
- sightbroke 2y agoThey invaded two countries simultaneously (one landlocked). Then used secret stealth helicopters to fly a hit squad into an allied nations territory for one particular individual. I don't think this is a fruitful debate but I doubt risk & cost are as much a determining factor as you'd like.