> Government workers are supposed to be working for the people, involvement in a union is a conflict of interest Whats the logic here? Unions protect against e

> Government workers are supposed to be working for the people, involvement in a union is a conflict of interest Whats the logic here? Unions protect against employers, not consumers. Where does "the people" come in this relationship? Securing your ability to not be fired because the new president doesn't like the color of your suit is indeed a benefit to both of us, even if you disagree with that person's views. >otherwise the government can just vote itself more and more funds for whatever without accountability. Since we're all deficit spending, t Yeah, it's almost like that's a career Killing move presidents avoid like the plauge. I wonder why. Must be because the people care so little about politics. Oh, but tarrifs? That's a great strategy. > Since we're all deficit spending, I wish the people at large cared even 10% as much about balancing the budget as they love to discuss about during the election season. You'd see from basic research that thr defecit oft rises during republican terms (over guess what? Tax breaks) and not as much over democrats. In fact, the fee times it fell came under democratic administrations. So the solution? Vote in the republican. One that already set a record for the biggest deficit increase and made a tarriff war that cost Americans billions. Surely he has the solution.