3 ms·
They didn’t call for mad violence against protestors. They didn’t call for arresting protestors. I imagine you won’t admit you have no evidence based in realit
by malcolmgreaves 2y ago
They didn’t call for mad violence against protestors. They didn’t call for arresting protestors.
I imagine you won’t admit you have no evidence based in reality.
- jauntywundrkind 2y agoAnd they didn't have Dem backed companies surveilling and trying to track protestors.
- kelipso 2y agoThey definitely called for arresting protesters. People don’t forget that easily lol. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4637548-democrats-split-over-campus-protest-crackdown/ https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4637548-democrats-split-...
- malcolmgreaves 2y agoNo. You’re being willfully ignorant at this point. There’s a difference between convicting people of crimes and arresting protestors because one side doesn’t like what they’re saying. The republicans are literally kidnapping people who have committed no crimes but are exercising their first amendment right to free speech, writing and publishing their political views. These people are now being held in inhumane conditions. This is stage one of torture: dehumanize. And you’re dodging the more pressing and serious issues: republicans in government are advocating of using violence against protestors they don’t like. You’re avoiding this because deep down you know you have no logical nor ethical standing.
- kelipso 2y agoYou need to stop accusing me of made up things derived from your paranoid delusions lol. Democrats wanted the protesters in jail and they put them in jail be they didn’t like what the protesters said. It really was that simple, so stop making things up from your fantasies so you can imagine this is something new and special or try to “win” some internet argument by accusing people of things that exist only in your imagination.