According to .... the FSF? They disapprove of a lot of licenses that meet OSI's definition of open source. There's quite a number in this list that meet OSI's

According to .... the FSF? They disapprove of a lot of licenses that meet OSI's definition of open source. There's quite a number in this list that meet OSI's definition (or are even explicitly approved by OSI), but are explicitly labelled non-free by FSF: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#NonFreeSoftwareLicenses https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#NonFreeSoftwa... Two clear examples are: Apple Public Source License 1.x NASA Open Source Agreement