>> I think that Trump’s approach, while more theoretically valid than it is being given credit for, is the wrong one. > I disagree that Trumps approach is "the

>> I think that Trump’s approach, while more theoretically valid than it is being given credit for, is the wrong one. > I disagree that Trumps approach is "theoretically valid". So do 16 Nobel Prize-winning economists and the entire stock market. Trump being wrong doesn't mean "16 Nobel Prize-winning economists and the entire stock market" is right if they disagree with him. Actually, I'd bet "16 Nobel Prize-winning economists and the entire stock market" have a myopic view that misses a lot of important things. Make a tradeoff that favors one of the things they miss for something they're myopically focused on? They'll scream bloody murder, but no one should listen to them until they wise up and expand their view (which they probably won't, because economics is miasma of dogma and numbers).