4 ms·
This looks interesting. At one point I wanted to use a third party library using luarocks, but I gave up because it wasn't immediately working/straight-forward.
by zaruvi 1y ago
This looks interesting. At one point I wanted to use a third party library using luarocks, but I gave up because it wasn't immediately working/straight-forward.
It may have been a skill issue though...
- andrewmcwatters 1y agoIn my experience, most people don't use luarocks anyway.
- MomsAVoxell 1y agoluarocks is easy to use, once you understand the importance of —-local all-the-things. Anyway, luarocks is easy to use, and is perfectly easy to integrate into most modern build and distribution tools. However, Lua is everywhere, so of course: ymmv. Disclaimer: I’ve been using Lua for decades now, its Just Great™ in my opinion.
- shortrounddev2 1y agoluarocks has too many packages which require building C libs from scratch. It's basically unusable on Windows
- mjmas 1y agoas long as I'm in a vs developer prompt on mine I haven't had a problem. I did build my own Lua though.
- johnisgood 1y agoAnd to make things worse, many of them do not compile successfully. That said, luarocks is still easy to use, the problem is unmaintained packages.
- johnisgood 1y agoThey should, it is a breeze.