Did for-profit companies prop up Stallman, too? According to you they must have because his definition of Free Software likewise excludes any license (e.g., no

Did for-profit companies prop up Stallman, too? According to you they must have because his definition of Free Software likewise excludes any license (e.g., no commercial use) that restricts how the software can be used. As does the Debian Free Software Guidelines. (Also, I think you mean trademark case, not copyright case.)