3 ms·
I have some question that is relevant that the author or someone knowledgeable and have tried those might answer. Does XML work better when feeding context to
by elashri 2y ago
I have some question that is relevant that the author or someone knowledgeable and have tried those might answer.
Does XML work better when feeding context to LLM or plain text or something like json? Did anyone try or have a theory about difference (as an input to the LLM not about processing the files/folders)?
Also wouldn't this be a good WASM usage or even just plain webpage? I know that processing large codebases like chrome/Linux would be better served via something else like Go program but would this even be useful? The context window of our best models is the real limit here and not the serialization speed of the context. using RAG is different league and out of consideration here of course.
I liked repoprompt [1] features during beta test but they then moved to $200 price tag which is hard for me to justify for my use case. Also it is Mac only and I mainly develop on Linux which is why I think something like webapp or WASM will be the more suitable option. I maybe wrong on several points here but no problem, I welcome any correction or explanation
[1] https://repoprompt.com https://repoprompt.com
- SparkyMcUnicorn 2y agoFor the times I need this type of tool, I sometimes reach for repomix[0]. It does have a webpage[1], although I've never used it. It supports XML, Markdown, and plain text. XML is the default, and I've found it to perform well, but it might be a good tool to test differences for yourself. If you're looking for an alternative to repoprompt, I'd recommend checking out Aider's copy-paste mode[2]. [0] https://github.com/yamadashy/repomix https://github.com/yamadashy/repomix [1] https://repomix.com/ https://repomix.com/ [2] https://aider.chat/docs/usage/copypaste.html https://aider.chat/docs/usage/copypaste.html
- siva7 2y agoXML works better with Claude. I would assume the same for Openai.