4 ms·
[flagged]
by thimkerbell 2y ago
[flagged]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- frereubu 2y agoI feel like I've started to see lots of weirdly anodyne comments like this on HN recently, with a kind of pointless summary of all or part of the article. Has this always happened and my LLM spider-sense is tingling too much, or are they written by real people whose purpose I don't get?
- pvg 2y agoIt happens on and off although LLMery might have made it worse. It's generally flaggable stuff: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&query=by%3Adang%20summary%20comments&sort=byDate&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
- frereubu 2y agoI do flag it when it's particularly anodyne, but I'm intrigued by its purpose. Why does anyone bother to do it?
- pvg 2y agoEasy upvotes from people who hit the comments first before looking at the article, mostly.
- frereubu 2y agoBut do they really get upvoted for such pointless comments? I'd be really interested to see the numbers. I suppose it could be cargo culting, where they see others do it and think it must work, even if it doesn't.
- pvg 2y agoI imagine some of them do since it's seen as a 'convenience' for the reader who might upvote the comment (and the article itself, if it's something they're interested in). And yes I think it does have some kind of social element - people do it in other places and it drifts back into HN. There's a whole bunch of such folklore some of which gets naturally misapplied to HN, 'don't downvote for disagreement' probably being the most famous-while-inaccurate.
- thimkerbell 2y agoI will leave you to your pondering, sir.
- thimkerbell 2y agoDang, how do I delete my comment? My hope that it'd be informative to HN readers that weren't interested in going crude seems to have been in vain.