3 ms·
Nope. None of it is. The experimental nature is part of the fun and part of the flex. I think there's little incentive to keep it very stable or safe. In gener
by muzani 2y ago
Nope. None of it is. The experimental nature is part of the fun and part of the flex. I think there's little incentive to keep it very stable or safe.
In general, experimental technology tends to take 3 or so years to solidify. But AI is different... models from 6 months ago are already deprecated. Not a lot has ever solidified in this space.
- dtagames 2y agoI second that. MCP is more of a scaffolding concept than a solution itself. There is no safety in consulting an LLM on anything. What you're building is a RAG app that must coordinate LLM calls and tool calls. Any safety built into that is going to built into your procedural code (in a programming language) and not coming from an LLM, which by itself cannot be "corralled." MCP is just a way of specifying which user prompts go with which LLM calls and tool calls and provides no safety (or even functionality) of its own.