3 ms·

The whole MCP hype really shows how much of AI is bullshit. These LLMs have consumed more API documentation than possible for a single human and still need soft

The whole MCP hype really shows how much of AI is bullshit. These LLMs have consumed more API documentation than possible for a single human and still need software engineers to write glue layers so they can use the APIs.

machiaweliczny 2y ago
Because it’s lossy compression. I also consumed a lot of books and even more movies and I don’t have good memory of it all. But some core facts and intuition from it.
- sksxihve 2y ago
  AI is far better at regurgitating facts than me even if it's lossy compression but if someone gives me an api doc I can figure out how to use it without them writing a wrapper library around the parts that I need to use to solve whatever problem I'm working on.
  - maccard 2y ago
    > but if someone gives me an api doc I can figure out how to use it without them writing a wrapper library around the parts that I need to use to solve whatever problem I'm working on. I think this is where AI is faling short hugely. AI _should_ be able to integrate with IDEs and tooling (e.g. LSP, Treesitter, Editorconfig) to make sure that it's contextually doing the right thin. But it's not.
maccard 2y ago
I don't think I agree, entirely. The problem is that up until _very_ recently, it's been possible to get LLMs to generate interesting and exciting results (as a result of all the API documentation and codebases they've inhaled), but it's been very hard to make that usable. I think we need to be able to control the output format of the LLMs in a better way before we can work on what's in the output. I don't konw if MCP is the actual solution to that, but it's certainly an attempt at it...
- sksxihve 2y ago
  That's reasonable along with your comment below too, but when you have the ceo of anthropic saying "AI will write all code for software engineers within a year" last month I would say that is pretty hard to believe given how it performs without user intervention (MCP etc...). It feels like bullshit just like the self driving car stuff did ~10 years ago.
  - maccard 2y ago
    I completely agree with you there. I think we're a generation away from these tools being usable with light supervision in the way I _want_ to use them, and I think the gap between now and that is about 10x smaller than the gap between that and autonomous agents.

machiaweliczny 2y ago

Because it’s lossy compression. I also consumed a lot of books and even more movies and I don’t have good memory of it all. But some core facts and intuition from it.

sksxihve 2y ago
AI is far better at regurgitating facts than me even if it's lossy compression but if someone gives me an api doc I can figure out how to use it without them writing a wrapper library around the parts that I need to use to solve whatever problem I'm working on.
- maccard 2y ago
  > but if someone gives me an api doc I can figure out how to use it without them writing a wrapper library around the parts that I need to use to solve whatever problem I'm working on. I think this is where AI is faling short hugely. AI _should_ be able to integrate with IDEs and tooling (e.g. LSP, Treesitter, Editorconfig) to make sure that it's contextually doing the right thin. But it's not.

maccard 2y ago

I don't think I agree, entirely. The problem is that up until _very_ recently, it's been possible to get LLMs to generate interesting and exciting results (as a result of all the API documentation and codebases they've inhaled), but it's been very hard to make that usable. I think we need to be able to control the output format of the LLMs in a better way before we can work on what's in the output. I don't konw if MCP is the actual solution to that, but it's certainly an attempt at it...

sksxihve 2y ago
That's reasonable along with your comment below too, but when you have the ceo of anthropic saying "AI will write all code for software engineers within a year" last month I would say that is pretty hard to believe given how it performs without user intervention (MCP etc...). It feels like bullshit just like the self driving car stuff did ~10 years ago.
- maccard 2y ago
  I completely agree with you there. I think we're a generation away from these tools being usable with light supervision in the way I _want_ to use them, and I think the gap between now and that is about 10x smaller than the gap between that and autonomous agents.