3 ms·
It's actually not table stakes nor a matter of eligibility. We've had several SecDefs, all dramatically more competent than Hegseth, who did not have any milita
by sorcerer-mar 2y ago
It's actually not table stakes nor a matter of eligibility. We've had several SecDefs, all dramatically more competent than Hegseth, who did not have any military experience.
- ethbr1 2y agoRecently, from review: William J. Perry (94-97, 2+5yr Army) William Cohen (97-01) Robert Gates (06-11, 2yr AF) Leon Panetta (11-13, 2yr Army) Chuck Hagel (13-15, 1yr Army)* Ash Carter (15-17) * To be fair, Hagel's year was volunteering to be drafted and sent to Vietnam as an infantry squad leader
- vitus 2y ago> We've had several SecDefs, all dramatically more competent than Hegseth, who did not have any military experience. Who do you have in mind? Carter, Cohen, and Cheney were the only confirmed secretaries from the past 40 years who fit "no military experience". There are a handful of recent secretaries with < 5 years of military experience who did not even reach the rank of Captain (e.g. Rumsfeld, Robert Gates, Panetta, Perry). To be clear: I agree with you that military experience is not really a qualification for the job, unless the individual has achieved high enough rank (i.e. General) to be involved in strategic planning. And certainly most secretaries of defense don't have that (Austin and Mattis are quite rare on that front, doubly so because they needed congressional waivers to serve in the position while still being active-duty military).