> This means it can be passed more quickly. Is that a goal here? I'm hypothesizing that this maneuver has been done in order to withdraw the original bill, not

> This means it can be passed more quickly. Is that a goal here? I'm hypothesizing that this maneuver has been done in order to withdraw the original bill, not in order to pass the new bill. I assume that if the new bill fails, the maneuver will have succeeded. The question is why this was easier than actually killing the original bill.