> (Given enough time, and the possibility of time travel being invented, it has to happen eventually, right?) I like to imagine if time travel were real, that

> (Given enough time, and the possibility of time travel being invented, it has to happen eventually, right?) I like to imagine if time travel were real, that we wouldn't necessarily know what was changed, because it would have been changed before we knew about it. Time marches on, so a clone or fork is made of the universe and time just carries on from whatever the tamper was. So, the fact we're discussing it means: time travel exists but Roko's Basilisk does never; or time travel does not exist and the actuality of Roko's basilisk is unknowable. I was going to say any permutation of those four things but I am very tied and I am unsure if that is a weaker argument. Tot zeins