The system told people, you are investing in a non-profit. Ut told the outside world 'we are acting as a non profit, for good of humanity. Now that the donatio

The system told people, you are investing in a non-profit. Ut told the outside world 'we are acting as a non profit, for good of humanity. Now that the donations are in, the goodwill from users and regulators have been harvested. It seems like open ai is effectively pulling the rug on everyone who acted on the assumption that open ai was a non profit. The system should, generally, prevent rug pulls. Besides, the most charitable reading here is "if we can't distribute profits, we can't fund ourselves" which doesn't fit the 100x payput cap. It seems instead a mix of the potential profit being too juicy, and a desire to change course to less ethical operation. It certainly isn't obvious the system should allow this. Nor is it obvious this is just 'a business deal'.