3 ms·

"Is Paul Newman known for having had problems with alcohol?" https://chatgpt.com/share/67f332e5-1548-8012-bd76-e18b3f8d5276 https://chatgpt.com/share/67f332e5-

"Is Paul Newman known for having had problems with alcohol?" https://chatgpt.com/share/67f332e5-1548-8012-bd76-e18b3f8d5276 https://chatgpt.com/share/67f332e5-1548-8012-bd76-e18b3f8d52... Your query indeed answers "...not widely known..." "Did Paul Newman have problems with alcoholism?" https://chatgpt.com/share/67f3329a-5118-8012-afd0-97cc4c9b72b2 https://chatgpt.com/share/67f3329a-5118-8012-afd0-97cc4c9b72... "Yes, Paul Newman was open about having struggled with alcoholism" What's the issue? Perhaps Paul Newman isn't _famous_ ("known") for struggling with alcoholism. But he did struggle with alcoholism. Your usage of "known for" isn't incorrect, but it's indeed slightly ambiguous.

posterguy 2y ago
Counterpoint: Paul Newman was absolutely a famous drunk, as evidenced by this Wikipedia page.* Any query for "paul newman alcohol" online will return dozens of reputable sources on the topic. Your post is easily interpretable as handwaving apologetics, and it gives big "Its the children who are wrong" energy. *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newman_Day https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newman_Day
- mustyoshi 2y ago
  "Paul Newman alcohol" is just showing you results where those words are all present, it's not really implying how widely known it is.
  - posterguy 2y ago
    What are you, an LLM? Look at the results of the first twenty hits and come back, then tell me that they don't speak to that specific issue.
    - mbarria 2y ago
      Widely reported does not imply widely known.
      - posterguy 2y ago
        How else does an LLM distinguish what is widely known, given there are no statistics collected on the general populations awareness of any given celebrities vices? Robo-apologetics in full force here.