12 ms·
Fortunately with LLM's we can generate data and not store it. If you think about it that means articles could always be relevant with additional details added a
by cactusplant7374 2y ago
Fortunately with LLM's we can generate data and not store it. If you think about it that means articles could always be relevant with additional details added as time goes on.
- tylerrobinson 2y agoNo, the reality of this situation is that people need to save a snapshot of what the LLM said when they read it, just in case they need to substantiate it or blame someone for what they read at the time.
- cactusplant7374 2y agoNo, it requires a shift in thinking. There are no guarantees with information one reads as it is.
- irjustin 2y agoAt the moment, I don't like this for fear of revisionist history. The equvilent would be if wikipedia didn't have to have a source reference. not saying that it's infallible but yeah we need some chain of audible at least 1 or 2 layers deep.