3 ms·
The trustworthy information that blue check marks indicated was not that the /contents of the message/ were objectively trustworthy, but that /a specific person
by addaon 2y ago
The trustworthy information that blue check marks indicated was not that the /contents of the message/ were objectively trustworthy, but that /a specific person was willing to be associated with the contents of the message/. That’s what was lost.
- josteink 2y agoAre you saying you think the semantics of that is anywhere near worth a billion dollar fine? When the changes were clearly communicated, and reported on by the press! In that case, what about the CSAM problem on the Meta-owned platforms? How many billions should that be?
- slowmovintarget 2y agoThat's right. This is not about the blue check marks at all. It's about X not censoring information to the EU's tastes, and them finding something... anything, to punish Elon for it.
- AlecSchueler 2y agoThe process for this began before the inauguration right?
- slowmovintarget 2y agoDon't know... Elon was a target before the inauguration anyhow.
- addaon 2y ago> Are you saying you think the semantics of that is anywhere near worth a billion dollar fine? Did you reply to the correct post? My post was about what trustworthy information was removed, not about my assessment of worth or interpretation of a law in a nation where I’m not a citizen or a lawyer…