3 ms·
You seem to be missing my point. Looking in one spot instead of another is included in what I’m calling “attention”. Of course paying attention to everything a
by pfannkuchen 2y ago
You seem to be missing my point.
Looking in one spot instead of another is included in what I’m calling “attention”. Of course paying attention to everything all the time would be and is a huge improvement. That is orthogonal to the type of vision tech being used. All approaches used in self driving systems today look everywhere all the time.
- crazygringo 2y agoYou were responding to a comment criticizing Musk for removing "radar/lidar". So I'm assuming that the "superhuman vision" you described meant specifically if people had LIDAR, since that was the subject at hand. LIDAR is superior to cameras because it much more accurately detects objects. It's an advantage all the time, and an especially huge advantage at night. So LIDAR isn't orthogonal to anything. It's the entire point. If people had LIDAR, the accident rate would be significantly reduced. You're arguing that LIDAR won't help cars, because by analogy it wouldn't help people if it was a native biological sense. But that's wrong.