I guess it boils down to this. Earlier in the thread people were saying removing lidar was bad becuase multiple sensors types is good, presuming the camera sta

I guess it boils down to this. Earlier in the thread people were saying removing lidar was bad becuase multiple sensors types is good, presuming the camera stay either way, and one is not replacing camera with radar. I agree with this. It's usually trivially easy to corner case defeat one sensor type, as your example shows, regardless of sensor type. They all have one weakness or another. That's why things like military systems have many sensor types. They really don't want to miss the incoming object so they measure it many different ways. Defeating many different sensor types is just way harder and therefore more unlikely to occur naturally. And yes, control systems can absolutely reliably combine the input of many sensors. This has been true for decades. Frankly I surprised more of these systems don't take advantage of sound. It's crazy cheap and society has been adding sound alerts to driving for a long time (sirens, car horns, train horns, etc.)