3 ms·
They're also "hiding" this information from OSHA, as stated in the article.
by windexh8er 2y ago
They're also "hiding" this information from OSHA, as stated in the article.
- l1tany11 2y agoNot if it’s below regulatory threshold. Which they seemed to say it was in the article (they said it’s below EPA threshold, so I assume that means the OSHA threshold too). The article never says how much they detected. I can only assume it’s because it’s a nothing amount. If it was significant they would have been saying how much. It’s hard to take the article seriously as a result. We have crazy sensitive tests now, they do nothing in the article to show it’s not just another story about how sensitive testing is these days.
- foolswisdom 2y ago> The article never says how much they detected. I can only assume it’s because it’s a nothing amount. If it was significant they would have been saying how much. It’s hard to take the article seriously as a result. Did we read the same article? There's a table with the amounts of different metals, with the amounts found in each of the different samples.