4 ms·
I don't see any comparable numbers on the page you linked. Seems to only have numbers for 1B and 3B parameter models. Comparisons to AWQ and OmniQuant in Tabl
by timschmidt 2y ago
I don't see any comparable numbers on the page you linked. Seems to only have numbers for 1B and 3B parameter models. Comparisons to AWQ and OmniQuant in Table 3 seem quite favorable with SeedLM showing 10% - 50% better performance.
Also seems like the techniques may be possible to combine.
- _0ffh 2y agoAs a rule of thumb, the bigger the model is, the more graciously it degrades under quantisation. So you may assume performance loss for a 8B model would be lower than for a 3B model. (I know that doesn't make up for missing numbers in link, just fyi.)