3 ms·
Lftr is supposed to be in the high nineties allegedly of fuel consumption %. And the gas/liquid nature means separation and processing is a lot more viable Co
by AtlasBarfed 2y ago
Lftr is supposed to be in the high nineties allegedly of fuel consumption %.
And the gas/liquid nature means separation and processing is a lot more viable
Contrast that with solid fuel rods using like 20% of its fuel, and that only of the fissile uranium isotopes. The the waste is locked in a solid form of the spent fuel rods
I'll take lftr which (theoretically) is so much cleaner.
Fusion isnt without waste, the high speed neutrons irradiate/transmute the reactor
- grepfru_it 2y agoReducing waste without a long term (multigenerational) plan does not solve the waste problem ;)