2 ms·
Not to dismiss Chollet’s work, but I’m starting to think he need prove nothing to even the muggles. For example, nearly any endurance athlete stands a good chan
by mikestew 2y ago
Not to dismiss Chollet’s work, but I’m starting to think he need prove nothing to even the muggles. For example, nearly any endurance athlete stands a good chance of being a Strava user. If you run in those circles, have you heard a single person with anything good to say about Strava’s “Athletic Intelligence”? Garmin is rolling out a beta right now that includes “AI Insights” or summat. Same deal: useless summaries like “you ran 5 miles today, which contributes to your aerobic base”. I could do better with a database and some if/else statements. And Garmin wants a subscription for this. (It’s included in Strava’s subscription, but I suppose you’re still paying for it.) And so now the memes tend toward “dumb AI insight of the day” on many online forums.
Seems to me that a lot of folks are enjoying having an LLM rewrite their email or whatever, but I wonder how many are actually buying the rest of it? The companies themselves sure aren’t helping.
- anthomtb 2y agoI use Strava for mountain biking and the Athletic Intelligence is just comical. "This ride was longer and harder than usual" - no sh*t, the map, elevation profile and my legs have already informed me. "You set 3 new PRs" - I can see that with one flick of the thumb thank you. "Consider a rest day" - consider? None of my job, spouse, equipment or body is too keen on doing that again for a while.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- fabbari 2y agoI think some of the AI demos are kind of comedy gems. I have seen the Apple Intelligence presentation a while ago and in the span of five minutes they had someone asking the assistant to expand a one liner into an e-mail and then someone receiving a long e-mail and asking the AI to summarize it. We spun GPUs to expand, then spun them again to summarize. Gold.
- soupfordummies 2y agoI'm taking a university course right now and one of the big textbook companies (McGraw-Hill, Macmillan, one of those) has an "AI Tutor" on their homework assignment. It's somehow LESS helpful than just having a pointer to which part of the text to revisit. It basically just restates the question/problem. Even worse than that is that it's an essentially STATIC note for each question yet it appears to be REAL-TIME GENERATED each time. I guess that could just be for appearances but it's just dumb all the way around really.