> The dot in the name has no semantics it's just a separator. That's not true of all module systems. It's true in Java, but not in Rust, where it establishes a

> The dot in the name has no semantics it's just a separator. That's not true of all module systems. It's true in Java, but not in Rust, where it establishes a parent-child relationship, and in which context [1]: > If an item is private, it may be accessed by the current module and its descendants. [1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/visibility-and-privacy.html#r-vis.access https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/visibility-and-privacy.h...