3 ms·
Just no, your tasks should be idempotent. Distributed transactions are stupid.
by lyu07282 2y ago
Just no, your tasks should be idempotent. Distributed transactions are stupid.
- williamdclt 2y agoThey’re not talking about distributed transactions: it’s not about a task being published and consumed atomically, it’s about it being consumed and executed atomically.
- lyu07282 2y agothe workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.