3 ms·
IMO the distinction is important; it tells me, broadly, what I can and cannot do with the source code. Heck, the .NET Framework source has been available for e
by p_ing 2y ago
IMO the distinction is important; it tells me, broadly, what I can and cannot do with the source code.
Heck, the .NET Framework source has been available for eons (referencesource.microsoft.com), but you can't go compile it and build your own .NET Framework distro (Mono is a different story).
- Imustaskforhelp 2y agothere was some guy on hackernews whose post I had read who had actually compiled .net entirely from source. Like the issue I think becomes that .net itself was written in .net and so you needed the earlier proprietary versions right? But Gnu also had a .net compiler and he had actually used it on guix (basically like nix) to really create sort of reproducible .net , I am sure that some reader of this comment will attach the post on which I am talking
- ameliaquining 2y agoI believe this was https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2024/adding-a-fully-bootstrapped-mono/ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2024/adding-a-fully-bootstrappe.... It was submitted to HN but only got a few comments.