6 ms·

Is there another option besides memfd_create? I'm currently using those to implement a circular buffer that avoids having to reconstruct objects if they happen

Is there another option besides memfd_create? I'm currently using those to implement a circular buffer that avoids having to reconstruct objects if they happen to cross the size boundary by mapping the same memory twice consecutively into the process space.

scottlamb 2y ago
On Unix-like platforms? sysv shared memory (shmget, etc). https://github.com/gnzlbg/slice_deque/blob/045fb28701d3b674b5da413266ca84b3e5a70190/src/mirrored/sysv.rs#L125-L136 https://github.com/gnzlbg/slice_deque/blob/045fb28701d3b674b... does this. (Though that code looks racy to me; unmapping the second half's virtual address space before mapping again is wrong. I guess it does that because shmat's SHM_REMAP flag is Linux-specific. At least it will fail rather than silently overwrite some other mapping. edit: oh, and it retries too, so not bad.) Seems like you could use shm_open + mmap also. On Linux, you could probably also do some juggling with mremap + MREMAP_DONTUNMAP, but I don't know why you'd prefer this over memfd_create.