4 ms·
It is a great concept, but the negative is that it is fantastically expensive, probably at the top end of per s.f. costs anywhere.
by gibsonf1 18y ago
It is a great concept, but the negative is that it is fantastically expensive, probably at the top end of per s.f. costs anywhere.
- jerf 18y agoYes, but this is the sort of thing a market would be good at, finding some optimal tradeoffs between cost and flexibility... if a market could be created. I don't know inner cities well enough to know whether that is true. If we're going to cite problems, mine would be that the concept probably only works with one person. With any more, everybody has to coordinate what "rooms" are available and the dependency graphs could be quite odd. Can I cook breakfast if you're sleeping in? Can I get to the shower if you're watching a movie? I would expect that even two people would be significantly inconvenienced and three might just lock up due to contention. Smaller, dedicated rooms may suck, but at least they are reasonably independent. But hey, for one guy, awesome. It's certainly in the running for "ultimate bachelor pad".
- hollerith 18y agoYeah, but you can put two of these multi-use spaces next to each other. His and hers :)