2 ms·
I understand it more intuitively from a chromaticity diagram, depicting color divorced from brightness: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple#/media/File:Line_of
by esafak 2y ago
I understand it more intuitively from a chromaticity diagram, depicting color divorced from brightness: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple#/media/File:Line_of_purples.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple#/media/File:Line_of_pur...
The curved rim of the horseshoe is the spectral locus; that of the purest, single wavelength spectral colors.
Purples are what you get when you travel between the ends of the horseshoe, where no spectral color lies. This is what is meant when one says purple exists only in our brains; it is non-spectral.
Furthermore, our vision is such that objectively different spectra can look the same; cf. metamers. This follows from the fact that the process of projecting an infinite dimensional spectra into three dimensions (because color is 3D) is lossy. But our vision optimizes the dimension reduction for spectral discrimination in parts of the electromagnetic spectrum that are beneficial for evolution.
- perihelions 2y agoThe spectral locus is highlighted in this one (for clarity), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931_color_space#Chromaticity_diagram https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931_color_space#Chromatic... That outer *bolded* edge is monochromatic light, as perceived by humans. The number labels are the wavelength in nanometers.
- esafak 2y agoI forgot to add that in addition to being non-spectral, they are the most saturated colors of their hue. All colors inside the horseshoe are non-spectral; they are mixtures of spectral colors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_purples https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_purples