4 ms·
Trump really held a gun to the head of the American economy and pulled the trigger.
by faefox 2y ago
Trump really held a gun to the head of the American economy and pulled the trigger.
- CamperBob2 2y agoHe is indistinguishable from a deliberate attack from Western civilization's worst enemies. What would Trump do differently if he were a Russian asset? I mean, besides trying not to be so obvious about it?
- faefox 2y agoAnd yet he's brainwashed (slightly less than) half of the population into believing heart and soul that he's here to save Western civilization. By ushering in the end of American hegemony and paving the way for China and Russia. We really are living in the post-truth era.
- AnimalMuppet 2y agoWell, Putin claims to be saving western civilization, too - saving it from a corrupt America. There's a distinct resemblance here between Putin's position, and Trump's.
- sorcerer-mar 2y agoI don't think the public opinion is as dire as it seems. He has a very vocal cult following, but the real swing in the election was politically disaffected people who are just really hard to reach. This is sad but the good news is that it's just a matter of reaching them — and MAGA is clearly and demonstrably failing on the number one issue for the vast majority of voters which is economy.
- amazingamazing 2y agoI think tariffs are terrible and will harm the economy, but the stock market isn't the economy (re: dow sliding).
- sorcerer-mar 2y agoI didn't say that it is. You don't have to take my word for it, American independent voters believe he is doing very badly on the economy.
- amazingamazing 2y agoOther than the stock market what metric are you using to indicate that the economy is doing badly? A jobs report just came out today indicating good growth there.
- sorcerer-mar 2y agoThe only leading indicators that really matter due to their self-fulfilling nature: people's confidence. The below is from before he started doing the thing "he's not stupid enough to do," these tariffs. > A poll of more than 220 U.S. CEOs finds business confidence at lowest level since November 2012—and recession fears on the rise. > Consumers’ expectations for the future at a 12-year low https://chiefexecutive.net/ceo-optimism-plummets-in-march-amid-tariff-uncertainty/ https://chiefexecutive.net/ceo-optimism-plummets-in-march-am... https://www.conference-board.org/topics/consumer-confidence https://www.conference-board.org/topics/consumer-confidence
- amazingamazing 2y agoso in other words there are no actual indicators yet.
- sorcerer-mar 2y agoWell the most responsive "actual" indicator we have is flashing bright red, but you've already decided that doesn't matter to you
- amazingamazing 2y ago
- spencerflem 2y agoThe democrats have an even lower approval rating and seem to be staunchly refusing to change. Assuming we still have elections, I don't see how it ends as anything other than swapping desperately back and forth between the two corporate parties.
- sorcerer-mar 2y ago> The democrats have an even lower approval rating and seem to be staunchly refusing to change. These two statements can't both be true for very long. The Democratic Party is going to reinvent itself. Turbulent and uncertain though it may be, this is how it works. The GOP just used its generational transformation, has been given free rein to prove their ideas, and lo and behold: they suck!
- spencerflem 2y agoThey haven't yet - they approved Trump's budget bill and Marco Rubio was voted in unanimously 99-0. They're still doing talks alongside Peter Thiel. Protestors are being arrested by Blue Govenors in Blue States. I used to be more hopeful but if they won't act now, in the direst of times, then they must actually be completely bought by corporate interests.
- sorcerer-mar 2y agoParties don't change by the individuals within them changing their minds, they change by replacing the individuals. People are absolutely livid about the things you're mentioning, which is why their approval ratings are low, which is why they're going to be replaced. > then they must actually be completely bought by corporate interests. This is a non-sequitur. I know it's an easy out to avoid thinking through the actual mechanics at play here (one of which is certainly corporate interests), but it's worth being more curious about this stuff and the individuals' motivations.
- spencerflem 2y agoI really hope you're right. It seems like their plan is a repeat of 2016, 2020, and 2024- to hope that Trump will be so unpopular that they can get elected without changing anything.
- thiht 2y agoTrump will just say the economy is better than ever and MAGA will say ok. They don't care about truth.
- spencerflem 2y agoHe didn't do the brainwashing, 60 years of having only right wing, billionaire owned media did that.
- conception 2y agoFunny that. Also I think you mean agent, not asset. He’s obviously an asset.
- regularization 2y agoTrump is supported by the people running Silicon Valley (Musk, Thiel, Andreessen - with Tim Cook and Jeff Bezos financing his inaugural), hedge fun titans like Robert Mercer, heartland industrialist like the Uihleins. Plus white, Christian, married families who don't live in large coastal cities support him in the majority. So I take this in the dialectic sense - that it is not destructive but self-destructive. Also the opposition's obsession with Russia points to their loss. The average American doesn't give a damn what Putin thinks. Trump is focused on the US (or maybe Canada or Greenland) while the opposition is focused on Russia. Liberal Denocrats disliked Russia when Khrushchev was in charge too, they just have some anti-Russian animus that you can read about in the New York Times back to 1925 and before.
- mingus88 2y agoIn 2012 the Republican candidate for president said that Russia was our biggest geopolitical adversary in the debates and the left laughed at him. Obama said something flippant about the 80s Mitch McConnell, arguably the most powerful Republican senator in a generation, has also recently issued a rare criticism of Trump and his alliance with Putin, deeply damaging his own standing in his party. We can also add many other conservative leaders who are no longer in power to that list, because there is no space for dissent in a fascist party. But please continue to try and strawman the left as having no good reason aside from loss to raise the alarm on an obvious Russian asset controlling the worlds largest superpower
- omnee 2y agoA real life Manchurian candidate, whether by intention or not.
- alabastervlog 2y agoA bunch of the tariffs still haven't even taken effect (despite his repeatedly saying they were hitting at midnight when he made the announcement Tuesday—I guess I shouldn't have been surprised when I found out Wednesday that that was bullshit, but I still was). This continues to mostly be harm from him just constantly going back and forth on the notion. It can get so much worse if he sticks with it this time.
- seydor 2y agoit wasnt really so clean