4 ms·
What is the downside of the scenario where only the rich can afford to own houses or land? After all historically, the rich owned the land and just allowed the
by themaninthedark 2y ago
What is the downside of the scenario where only the rich can afford to own houses or land? After all historically, the rich owned the land and just allowed the poor to live there.
- glenstein 2y agoYou can't think of a middle ground between runaway antibiotic resistance and taking away poor people's houses?
- themaninthedark 2y agoThere is. Just as the GP was responding to a comment about meat availability and not just wanting to end meat consumption. >That's part of the problem. You wanting the burger has all these negative consequences for humans, animals and nature.
- glenstein 2y agoI'm not seeing how that context makes your comment make more sense. I am not seeing that they were charged with any kind of unreasonable extrapolation along the lines of "wanting to end meat consumption," nor why that would create context that sets up your dichotomy. Now it sounds like you're saying you know there was a middle ground but were saying it anyway to make some kind of rhetorical point, but I don't know what rhetorical point you are making.