3 ms·

I would like to add context for others that this was explicitly laid out in the "Project 2025" agenda. Accuweather was cited as an example, and Accuweather resp

I would like to add context for others that this was explicitly laid out in the "Project 2025" agenda. Accuweather was cited as an example, and Accuweather responded saying they do not agree with the agenda: https://www.accuweather.com/en/press/accuweather-does-not-support-project-2025-plan-to-fully-commercializing-nws-operations-noaa-has-critical-role-in-american-weather-enterprise/1670156 https://www.accuweather.com/en/press/accuweather-does-not-su...

move-on-by 2y ago
The current administration was also cited during elections as not being part of Project 2025 and not going to follow it. Actions speak louder than words. We will see how it plays out I suppose.
- garciasn 2y ago
  “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - GOP / Project 2025
- alabastervlog 2y ago
  The actions were bringing in a ton of people who worked on it, to the campaign and nascent administration before the election, which happened before Trump's lies about how that wasn't the plan.
InitialLastName 2y ago
The same Accuweather whose previous CEO (and founder's brother) was Donald Trump's nominee to run NOAA in the last administration? Color me shocked that, under the last administration and when it looked like the Trump campaign had a good chance of self-destructing, they wrote a milquetoast "we don't support this at all ;-)" press release about his agenda.