3 ms·
I don’t think they actually call it open source themselves – rather, the HN poster made a (probably benign) mistake.
by notpushkin 2y ago
I don’t think they actually call it open source themselves – rather, the HN poster made a (probably benign) mistake.
- ecedeno 2y agoThe founder does. See: https://x.com/shl/status/1908090697984426227 https://x.com/shl/status/1908090697984426227
- notpushkin 2y agoYikes :-(
- gcau 2y agoIt's not a mistake because someone doesn't subscribe to the same definition as you. There are 2 widely competing definitions that are both perfectly valid, if you want to be more specific you can say "not OSI approved" to more accurately reflect what you're talking about, if you don't want to do that then you can understand how others feel.