3 ms·
Makes me wonder if the generic servos of the described kind are really close enough to the performance a cheap-class servo can have, or if modern advances in mo
by namibj 2y ago
Makes me wonder if the generic servos of the described kind are really close enough to the performance a cheap-class servo can have, or if modern advances in monolithic power stage ICs could allow a servo free of sliding movement (no brushes, no wiper potentiometer (maybe a capacitively coupled differential sensing of angle, or the tricks of the cheap digital calipers with their iirc nonius-like scale read through several parallel tracks of non-touching capacitive electrodes?), instead just a clever chip digitally controlling a brushless electric machine using the feedback sensing available to it).
Being able to run an even just very simple digital controller allows things like severely dropping negative feedback gain at a resonance frequency of the larger system.
And so much more.
- Animats 2y agoThe nice thing about using a potentiometer for position sensing is that you don't have to home the thing. There are lots of alternative sensors, but most are bigger, heavier, or more expensive. If 1% precision is good enough, pots are fine. The next step up is Dynamixel servos, which have a nice daisy-chain digital interface, encoders, about the same form factor as toy-type servos, at about 10x the price.[1] [1] https://www.robotis.us/dynamixel/ https://www.robotis.us/dynamixel/