2 ms·
They may have a slightly stronger case for defamation or similar because chess.com said the account was closed for "fair play violation", but still.
by stevage 2y ago
They may have a slightly stronger case for defamation or similar because chess.com said the account was closed for "fair play violation", but still.
- jcranmer 2y agoThe case for defamation is weaker than normal here, since chess.com (from what I can tell) never told anyone but the user that they considered them a cheater--there's no statement being made that can have the quality of being defamatory in the first place, except the statement being made by the user.