Not to mention the article is a bit disgenuous because they only focus on inference on the consumer side (thus also helping to drive up demand for training?) A

Not to mention the article is a bit disgenuous because they only focus on inference on the consumer side (thus also helping to drive up demand for training?) Author is prof at EPFL I find his other article on generative bio LLMs more interesting https://substack.com/home/post/p-159626430 https://substack.com/home/post/p-159626430 >Remarkably, Evo 2 wasn’t even trained on human variant data - only on the standard human reference genome. Yet it can still infer which mutations are harmful in humans, because it seems to have learned the evolutionary constraints on genomic sequences.