3 ms·
Interesting! How do you see this comparing with Bytewax - https://github.com/bytewax/bytewax https://github.com/bytewax/bytewax
by skadamat 2y ago
Interesting! How do you see this comparing with Bytewax - https://github.com/bytewax/bytewax https://github.com/bytewax/bytewax
- menziess 2y agoCompared to Bytewax, Slipstream puts the emphasis on freedom, at the cost of having to implement certain features yourself. This freedom let's you do things that other libraries may not offer within the bounds of their API. For instance, I do see that joins and windows are supported in Bytewax, but is it possible to do more complex stateful joins based timestamps (temporal joins) or other arbitrary conditions? If it does, then that's great. But I've had experiences where limitations became apparent during an end-phase of a project. When the API starts to reach its limits, but you're already invested in it quite deeply.