3 ms·
(below is my shallow res, maybe naive?) That might inject a ton of $ into "IP", doing further damage to the creative commons. How can we support remix culture
by chrisweekly 2y ago
(below is my shallow res, maybe naive?)
That might inject a ton of $ into "IP", doing further damage to the creative commons.
How can we support remix culture for humans, while staving off ultimately-destructive AI slop?
Maybe copyleft / creative-commons licenses w/ explicit anti-AI prohibitions? Tho that could have bad ramifications too.
ALL of this makes me kind of uncomfortable and sad, I want more creativity and fewer lawyers.
- mcmcmc 2y ago> doing further damage to the creative commons Not sure I understand this part. Because creators would be getting paid for their works being used for someone else’s commercial gain?
- chrisweekly 2y agoBecause it reinforces the idea that creative works should usually involve lawyers.
- mcmcmc 2y agoNo it doesn’t. It reinforces that copyright is the law. If you don’t violate someone’s copyright, you don’t need a lawyer.