3 ms·
This isn't surprising in any way is it? And it just goes to show that no model will ever be a box from which you can trust the output isn't tainted by copyright
by alkonaut 2y ago
This isn't surprising in any way is it? And it just goes to show that no model will ever be a box from which you can trust the output isn't tainted by copyrights, or that you don't inadvertently use someones' likeness. It's not a copyright laundering machine. Nor will it be used as one. "But I used an AI model" isn't some magic way to avoid legal trouble. You are in as much legal trouble using these images as you are using the "originals".
- why_at 2y agoYeah I don't really understand what the thesis of this article is. Copyright infringement would apply to any of those images just the same as if you made them yourself. I don't think it's possible to create an "alien which has acid for blood and a small sharp mouth within a bigger mouth" without anybody seeing a connection to Alien, even if it doesn't look anything like the original.
- layer8 2y agoYour second paragraph may be true, but the mere abstract presence of those features wouldn’t infringe copyright.