2 ms·
I was really enjoying the article until I realized there is zero attribution to the book _Thinking in Bets_, which IMO this is obviously heavily influenced by.
by abbadadda 2y ago
I was really enjoying the article until I realized there is zero attribution to the book _Thinking in Bets_, which IMO this is obviously heavily influenced by.
- abbadadda 2y agoBut there IS this? > [13] Not a reference to the book, which I haven’t read — this is just a phrase I use Seems to me an unwillingness to cite / give proper attribution to Annie Duke and the book, which is super weird? At any rate I’d highly recommend the book.
- emursebrian 2y agoThe author specifically said he didn't ready the book.
- abbadadda 2y agoMy point is that I think that the author is lying. I think that he read the book, took many of the ideas (e.g., truth seeking), pawned them off as his own novel ideas, and explicitly did not give attribution which I think is extremely weird.