3 ms·
The strange thing here is that you've chosen to defend the indefensible on the grounds of trying to "both sides" something that really is only from one side.
by knowaveragejoe 2y ago
The strange thing here is that you've chosen to defend the indefensible on the grounds of trying to "both sides" something that really is only from one side.
- coldtea 2y agoNot only it's not "indedensible", but the full unedited transcript proves it was perfectly sane.